Coming Out, Part Two
Apr. 29th, 2005 10:23 pmThe last thing I came out about went a lot better than I expected it to. Maybe this one will, too. A lot more people already know it, at least.
Lt.Warhound and I have an open relationship. We always have, for the last eight years of our relationship. Longer, if you count the time when our FurryMUCK characters were in an open relationship online.*
The irony here is that one of the advantages to being in an open relationship is that if you get into another relationship, you don't have to hide it. Lut doesn't mind, so I don't need to keep it secret from him. And he's the only one whose opinion matters, right?
Except that I didn't want to tell people I was in an open relationship with Lut. So I've wound up hiding things anyway.
Getting pretty tired of hiding stuff. Some people are good at keeping secrets, but I'm not. Not good at hiding my feelings, anyway. Sometimes I wish I was, but I'm 34 and if I haven't figured it out yet, I doubt I ever will.
I used to tell myself, "It's nobody else's business, anyway." I suppose that's true. But the reason I didn't tell anyone isn't that I wanted privacy, but that I was afraid of what people would think. Of what my friends would think. Oh, I still want a little privacy, which is why I'm not going into many details of what sorts of other relationships Lut or I have had over the last eight years.**
But I am going to say this:
I love
ltwarhound.
And I love
koogrr.
And I am very happy that I am in the kind of relationship with both of them where that's OK.
* This fact is one of the reasons I don't call myself a Christian; one of those 'but I strongly disagree with this teaching' things that kept me from believing in Christ at all for so long. I do believe in Christ as Savior, but I know that some of my other beliefs are so wildly different from most Christians that I don't want to co-opt their label.
** Not very many. Trust me, we're not exciting swinger types.
Lt.Warhound and I have an open relationship. We always have, for the last eight years of our relationship. Longer, if you count the time when our FurryMUCK characters were in an open relationship online.*
The irony here is that one of the advantages to being in an open relationship is that if you get into another relationship, you don't have to hide it. Lut doesn't mind, so I don't need to keep it secret from him. And he's the only one whose opinion matters, right?
Except that I didn't want to tell people I was in an open relationship with Lut. So I've wound up hiding things anyway.
Getting pretty tired of hiding stuff. Some people are good at keeping secrets, but I'm not. Not good at hiding my feelings, anyway. Sometimes I wish I was, but I'm 34 and if I haven't figured it out yet, I doubt I ever will.
I used to tell myself, "It's nobody else's business, anyway." I suppose that's true. But the reason I didn't tell anyone isn't that I wanted privacy, but that I was afraid of what people would think. Of what my friends would think. Oh, I still want a little privacy, which is why I'm not going into many details of what sorts of other relationships Lut or I have had over the last eight years.**
But I am going to say this:
I love
And I love
And I am very happy that I am in the kind of relationship with both of them where that's OK.
* This fact is one of the reasons I don't call myself a Christian; one of those 'but I strongly disagree with this teaching' things that kept me from believing in Christ at all for so long. I do believe in Christ as Savior, but I know that some of my other beliefs are so wildly different from most Christians that I don't want to co-opt their label.
** Not very many. Trust me, we're not exciting swinger types.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 03:45 am (UTC)Can't say I'm shocked. Doesn't really suprise me at all. But then a lot of my friends are... and I never presume any relationship is open or closed unless specifically told so. Even then it's kinda 'ho hum, that's nice', non of my business really. *grins*
Still some folks tweak my perceptive nature, or intution or something more than others and I end up saying something goofy like "I'm not surprised". *smiles*
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 01:39 pm (UTC)I love you!
(Wow, so much more space out here than in that cramped little closet. Mm, roomy.)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 05:22 am (UTC)Thank you for being brave enough to share.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 06:29 am (UTC)To hear you and Koogrr are involved is no great surprise given the strength of the connections between you both in your writings over the past couple of years.
My best wishes for all of you guys, poly can be challenging at times, but quite a fair number of folks out there are making it work every day.
CYa!
Mako
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 07:14 am (UTC)Well, I see no reason to judge you about this either. You're all rational adults and seem comfortable with it. One of my best friends has a husband and a wife and it seems to work out well. Only possible thing I could think of to say about it is that it seems like something that not everyone would be able to make work. But if you can, and have no regrets, more power!
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 02:06 pm (UTC)That's a good thing! I do have a lot of close and cuddly friendships that are just that -- friendships. One of the reasons I didn't want to say anything about being in an open relationship is that I'm afraid people will start assigning ulterior motives to many perfectly platonic gestures on my part. :/ Anyway, I think it speaks well of you that you didn't. :)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 10:40 am (UTC)Hope it all works! :)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 10:59 am (UTC)Anyway, I don't fully understand, but I approve and wish you luck. =:)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 12:23 pm (UTC)old, tired, predictabletraditional Christian objections to this.no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 12:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Happy for you
Date: 2005-04-30 01:42 pm (UTC)Re: Happy for you
Date: 2005-04-30 02:08 pm (UTC). o O (Is this going to be a trilogy?)
Date: 2005-04-30 02:10 pm (UTC)That's as legitimate a fear as any other, I think.
People's thoughts, justifiable or not, can have a powerful effect on both the thinker and the topic of their thought. (If that was rather muddled, I apologize.)
I think what I meant is, a lot of people have a tendency to "re-stereotype" a person based on some new tidbit of info, combined with their own preconceived notions. Politically-minded -- and religion-minded -- people do it all the time (though not all of them, of course. And maybe not even most of them. But enough of them.)
You shouldn't have to deal with other people's mental baggage. So I totally understand the need to lock the entry. To me, one of the aspects of being a friend is that you accept and appreciate a person, regardless of what you might find out about them.
Does that mean we agree with everything they do? Of course not. I don't think there's a rule anywhere that says that. But I do think there are things that fall under the "none o' my beeswax" category, and I'm pretty sure this is one of them.
(Wow, all of this waffling has made me hungry for some real waffles...)
Re: . o O (Is this going to be a trilogy?)
Date: 2005-04-30 05:07 pm (UTC)Re: . o O (Is this going to be a trilogy?)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 06:46 pm (UTC)It works for some, not for all, yet the fact that it does work in select situations (and has countless times, over mankind's long history) speaks, in itself, volumes.
All the best!
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 07:57 pm (UTC)Yeah. My relationship with Lut has lasted eight years, so far; before that, my longest relationship with one person was four. Obviously, there are many factors at work that make me happy with my relationship with Lut. But his lack of jealousy does help a lot. (And I don't get jealous of him, either, but I think that would've been true in any of my prior relationship, had previous SOs been interested in polyamory).
I used to engage in a kind of 'serial monogamy', where I'd break up with one man whenever I got interested in another. Not a good thing. I'm very glad and grateful to be involved with the men that I am now.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-30 07:29 pm (UTC)There will always be challenges. May they be minimal in their effects, and may you overcome them in the very best ways.
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2005-05-01 01:10 am (UTC)you silly, silly woman
Date: 2005-04-30 07:34 pm (UTC)Re: you silly, silly woman
Date: 2005-04-30 07:43 pm (UTC)And I like and respect all my friends, even the ones who don't approve of some of my actions. So it's kinda difficult for me. But sometimes you just have to live with some disapproval.
Re: you silly, silly woman
From:Re: you silly, silly woman
From:Re: you silly, silly woman
From:Re: you silly, silly woman
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-01 04:55 am (UTC)Doesn't make me love you any less, though! I wouldn't enjoy an open relationship myself but that's me and not you.
Thank you for being so forthright about this. You're a braver woman than I am, Gunga Din! Or something like that. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-03 01:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-03 04:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-02 03:07 pm (UTC)Ah well, can't be new all the time. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-03 04:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:Not suprised
Date: 2005-05-03 11:21 pm (UTC)If it's working for you and makes you and your SO's happy, then I'm happy for you.
**hugs**
no subject
Date: 2005-05-14 10:41 pm (UTC)I'm glad to be able to post how happy I am about this.
You make my friend happy. You bring a light to his eyes and a confidence to his entire being that I've never seen before.
Thank you for that. :-) Thank you for loving him in the way that he deserves. The other stuff? Meh. It works itself out. :-)
You're welcome. :)
Date: 2005-05-17 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-16 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 03:44 am (UTC)And I'm glad he wanted to -- I feel a lot better, not trying to pretend to be normal. One of my first entries was a quote -- "It is better to be hated for what you are, than loved for what you are not." At the time, I posted it with a question: "Is it, do you think?"
Now that I think about it -- yeah, it is. Not that anyone hates me anyway. But if people are going to disapprove of the things I do and believe, I'd just as soon they knew where I stood, rather than assuming that I agreed with them.
Of course, most people have been really supportive, like you and Lady Peregrine. :) Thank you! I'm glad I got a chance to hang out with you while I was in Florida -- you're a great person. *hug*
PS: And I gotta agree with you -- John is an awesome guy. :)