Georgette Heyer, The Convenient Marriage
Jul. 24th, 2019 07:16 pmThis might be my least favorite of the Heyer books I've read so far. The male protagonist is twice the age of the female protagonist and I didn't like either of them. Some of the supporting cast was entertaining. There are the usual hijinks, some of which were amusing, but for the most part without protagonists that I could actually like it just was not a fun experience. I skimmed my way to the end just to see if the characters would redeem themselves, but meh. This was like a 5, I guess.
I put another Heyer book on reserve, one that was specifically recommended, because I am still in the mood to read one but I want it to be good this time. c_c Wish me luck!
I put another Heyer book on reserve, one that was specifically recommended, because I am still in the mood to read one but I want it to be good this time. c_c Wish me luck!
no subject
Date: 2019-09-15 08:42 pm (UTC)Heyer herself is the one who said she had two types of heroes, so this seems a legit interpretation.
I read A Civil Contract recently and found the characters sympathetic but the ending SUPER DEPRESSING, so I think I'm gonna take a break from Heyer for a while.
no subject
Date: 2022-06-25 04:18 am (UTC)(Also the high-maintenance drama queen alternate love interest is so obvsly, by the end if not before, such a godawful DRIP that you are so glad to see the back of her!)
PS: Am revisiting these ancient posts because I just finished Naomi Novik's Uprooted and I remembered you reviewed it and wanted to read again what you'd thought and then got distracted by these other reviews along the search for it...
no subject
Date: 2022-06-25 08:25 pm (UTC)I quickly fell in love with the female protagonist, and the male protag's attitude at the end came across to me as "I'm glad I married this woman because she's so useful, but I don't love her and I never will." I forget exactly why it is burned into my brain like this, but it is. :|
no subject
Date: 2022-06-25 09:05 pm (UTC)Or Heyer meant to show that you can have a successful marriage without love. Maybe he never does love her, or realize that he does. It could go either way, I suppose.
But I think at some point, years on, she has some brush with death from illness or childbirth or whatever and he realizes that he would really miss her if she died - not just as mother to the kids or homemaker, but for herself, and he goes, oh, huh. But in a low-key undramatic way *g*
no subject
Date: 2022-06-26 02:57 am (UTC)Or Heyer meant to show that you can have a successful marriage without love.
I would actually have been much more okay with "their marriage is a success even though it's not romantic" than the "his wife is in love with him and completely devoted to his well-being, while he regards her with a mild affection based entirely on her utility to him" that Heyer presented.
I mean, I didn't hate the book: it had a lot of good bits and humor stuff. I just found the ending extremely sad, in a way obviously most people do not. :)
no subject
Date: 2022-06-26 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-06-26 02:01 pm (UTC)Heyer is enormously popular for a reason! She writes well, with a particular flair for comedy IMO. And A Civil Contract was specifically recommended to me by another person who enjoyed it. I think your take is entirely appropriate. ♥