Reading Patterns
Mar. 8th, 2016 12:44 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
rowynI am thinking about the buying habits of readers, and trying to subdivide them into several categories, in relation to a single author's works:
* Character fan. Follows the books about one character/group of characters, may not read other books by same author.
* Setting fan. Follows the books in a particular setting. May not read other books by same author.
* Story arc fan: Reader will follow the story arc through a trilogy or series, but may not read more books in a new story arc about the same characters/setting.
* Genre fan. Reads author's works in a particular genre, but not in other genres.
* Theme/review based. Readers who pick up the author's works based on theme, or reviews. This group has tastes with regards to the author that are harder to slot into the usual groups, and the author's works sometimes suit those tastes and sometimes don't.
* Former fan: Reader followed one of the patterns above, but for one reason or another stopped. "Former fans" aren't necessarily people who stopped reading an author entirely. They might be people who bought the first five books of a ten+ book series, and then lost interest in that series but are still interested in one or more other works by the same author.
* Author fan. Reads everything the author writes, regardless.
* Casual. Picked up one book, may or may not ever get another by that author.
* Other
I don't mean for these categories to be "each person is one of these types of readers". I came up with these categories because they are all groups that I fall into for different authors.
Examples where I am:
Character Fan: P. B. O'Brian's Aubrey/Maturin books, Jim Hines' Libriomancer books.
Setting Fan: K.J. Charles, "Charm of Magpies" setting.
Author Fan: Diana Wynne Jones, Lois McMaster Bujold, Bard Bloom, Terry Pratchett, Brandon Sanderson
Story Arc Fan: J.K. Rowling's 7-book "Harry Potter" series.
Theme Fan: MCA Hogarth, Walter Jon Williams
Casual: Neil Gaiman (I started reading Neil Gaiman's Sandman in 1990 or so, and I've read at least three of his other books and a few short stories. I really liked Sandman at the time, but somehow none of his books that I tried have made me a fan of his non-comics work. I don't hate them, just not that into him.)
Other: Courtney Milan. I've read eight or so novels/novellas by her, and I expect to read more. But she has a bunch of books out that I haven't yet bought or read, and I don't have any plans to go get more.
Former Fan: These are all cases where I read at least three books but stopped, even though more have come out:
Setting
George R.R. Martin: Wildcards
Story Arc:
George R.R. Martin: Song of Ice and Fire
Character:
David Weber: Honor Harrington
L. K. Hamilton: Anita Blake
Author:
Anne McCaffrey
Piers Anthony (I was young and foolish. Seriously, he really does think like a teenager and anecdotal evidence shows he is inexplicably appealling to kids between 10-17 or so, then they grow up and can't really remember why. If you're one of those people who still has nostalgic fondness for one of his books, DO NOT GO BACK AND READ IT. You will have regrets.)
In a lot of these cases, it's hard to pin down why my reading habits are the way they are. I liked Charles' first three "Magpies" books and adored the spinoff, Jackdaw, but haven't sought out any of her other books in different series anyway.
In some cases, it was series fatigue: I stopped reading new Pern books long before I stopped reading McCaffrey entirely. I think that "historical romance fatigue" may be why I haven't read more books Courtney Milan. I liked the last historical romance I read by her, but I had a strange sense of 'sameness' while reading it that made me not want to get another one. I don't regard that as a "former fan" scenario because I'm pretty sure I will read more of her work in coming years.
Part of why I'm thinking about this is that it's so complicated. The "thousand true fans" theory hinges on the idea that you can hook people on your name, and they'll buy whatever you write. The "series sell" strategy hinges on "readers become hooked on a character or setting, and they won't necessarily read works with a different theme". And yet I know in my own experience that there are cases where I've read several books in a series and then quit that series -- but will still read other works by that author. As well as cases where I read a series but not other works by that author. OTOH, the "series sells" philosophy obviously works for most of the market, if not for me. Hamilton and Weber are very successful, 20+ books on in their series. And I've spoken to authors who kept writing in a successful series for the money, and yes, it worked for them better than branching out did. Even though they were sick of writing that series.
I don't really have any conclusions from this, just musings and questions. Do you have any categories I missed? Do you find yourself more likely to fall into a particular pattern with most authors, or does it vary wildly for you too?
* Character fan. Follows the books about one character/group of characters, may not read other books by same author.
* Setting fan. Follows the books in a particular setting. May not read other books by same author.
* Story arc fan: Reader will follow the story arc through a trilogy or series, but may not read more books in a new story arc about the same characters/setting.
* Genre fan. Reads author's works in a particular genre, but not in other genres.
* Theme/review based. Readers who pick up the author's works based on theme, or reviews. This group has tastes with regards to the author that are harder to slot into the usual groups, and the author's works sometimes suit those tastes and sometimes don't.
* Former fan: Reader followed one of the patterns above, but for one reason or another stopped. "Former fans" aren't necessarily people who stopped reading an author entirely. They might be people who bought the first five books of a ten+ book series, and then lost interest in that series but are still interested in one or more other works by the same author.
* Author fan. Reads everything the author writes, regardless.
* Casual. Picked up one book, may or may not ever get another by that author.
* Other
I don't mean for these categories to be "each person is one of these types of readers". I came up with these categories because they are all groups that I fall into for different authors.
Examples where I am:
Character Fan: P. B. O'Brian's Aubrey/Maturin books, Jim Hines' Libriomancer books.
Setting Fan: K.J. Charles, "Charm of Magpies" setting.
Author Fan: Diana Wynne Jones, Lois McMaster Bujold, Bard Bloom, Terry Pratchett, Brandon Sanderson
Story Arc Fan: J.K. Rowling's 7-book "Harry Potter" series.
Theme Fan: MCA Hogarth, Walter Jon Williams
Casual: Neil Gaiman (I started reading Neil Gaiman's Sandman in 1990 or so, and I've read at least three of his other books and a few short stories. I really liked Sandman at the time, but somehow none of his books that I tried have made me a fan of his non-comics work. I don't hate them, just not that into him.)
Other: Courtney Milan. I've read eight or so novels/novellas by her, and I expect to read more. But she has a bunch of books out that I haven't yet bought or read, and I don't have any plans to go get more.
Former Fan: These are all cases where I read at least three books but stopped, even though more have come out:
Setting
George R.R. Martin: Wildcards
Story Arc:
George R.R. Martin: Song of Ice and Fire
Character:
David Weber: Honor Harrington
L. K. Hamilton: Anita Blake
Author:
Anne McCaffrey
Piers Anthony (I was young and foolish. Seriously, he really does think like a teenager and anecdotal evidence shows he is inexplicably appealling to kids between 10-17 or so, then they grow up and can't really remember why. If you're one of those people who still has nostalgic fondness for one of his books, DO NOT GO BACK AND READ IT. You will have regrets.)
In a lot of these cases, it's hard to pin down why my reading habits are the way they are. I liked Charles' first three "Magpies" books and adored the spinoff, Jackdaw, but haven't sought out any of her other books in different series anyway.
In some cases, it was series fatigue: I stopped reading new Pern books long before I stopped reading McCaffrey entirely. I think that "historical romance fatigue" may be why I haven't read more books Courtney Milan. I liked the last historical romance I read by her, but I had a strange sense of 'sameness' while reading it that made me not want to get another one. I don't regard that as a "former fan" scenario because I'm pretty sure I will read more of her work in coming years.
Part of why I'm thinking about this is that it's so complicated. The "thousand true fans" theory hinges on the idea that you can hook people on your name, and they'll buy whatever you write. The "series sell" strategy hinges on "readers become hooked on a character or setting, and they won't necessarily read works with a different theme". And yet I know in my own experience that there are cases where I've read several books in a series and then quit that series -- but will still read other works by that author. As well as cases where I read a series but not other works by that author. OTOH, the "series sells" philosophy obviously works for most of the market, if not for me. Hamilton and Weber are very successful, 20+ books on in their series. And I've spoken to authors who kept writing in a successful series for the money, and yes, it worked for them better than branching out did. Even though they were sick of writing that series.
I don't really have any conclusions from this, just musings and questions. Do you have any categories I missed? Do you find yourself more likely to fall into a particular pattern with most authors, or does it vary wildly for you too?
no subject
Date: 2016-03-08 07:23 pm (UTC)(The two Xanth books that I can pin down why I liked them are: Castle Roogna and the one with Mare Imbrium. Because I am a sucker for non-human characters, EVEN IF ONE IS A GIANT SPIDER AND I HATE BEING AROUND SPIDERS. *headdesk*)
no subject
Date: 2016-03-09 03:21 am (UTC)Series: a story that plays out over multiple books, or that follows the same general cast through various adventures.
Setting: all the books take place in the same world/universe
Character: books that involve a particular character
These certainly overlap, but they don't always. To use Micah as an example:
A "series fan" might read say, the Dreamhealers books.
A "character fan" of Jahir and/or Vasiht'h fan would want to read the Dreamhealers books and the Princes' Game books, because they all have those two characters.
A "setting fan" would read all the Pelted books: Dreamhealers, Princes' Game, Earthrise, Alysha, etc.
Pratchett did this too. There are books about the guards, and books about Vimes, some of whichinclude the other guards but some don't, and books about the witches, and standalones. So the Discworld was a setting, not a series (by this definition) because it had a bunch of different series and standalones set in it.
David Eddings wrote the Belgariad, which was one series/story arc, and then a second series in the same world, with the same main characters, but starting a new story arc.
no subject
Date: 2016-03-09 04:50 am (UTC)*flails*
(No, no, the Mallorean was the same story arc! It explicitly said it was a reprise, because of that prophecy thing doing a certain amount of "actually, you have to keep doing this till you get it right." Or something like that. I mostly just remember Velvet suborning that other fellow's snake and keeping it in her bodice. And Belgarion realizing that just because the prophecy said "one son" didn't mean that a bunch of little (dryad) daughters wasn't an option. And flying being like swimming -- you don't think about the depth of the water when you're only using the surface, or something. ...and actually rather a lot of tidbits from both books. >_> Not so much the Belgareth/Polgara books, though, because those were getting a little....... ehhhh.)
no subject
Date: 2016-03-09 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-09 09:48 pm (UTC)I suppose there's probably a vague category of "it doesn't feel like X, and it's all tied together, so..." O:>
no subject
Date: 2016-03-10 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-10 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-10 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-14 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-14 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-10 02:51 am (UTC)This is actually a pretty good example of a place where I'm more of a character fan than anything, I guess. Because I've read most (all?) of the Watch "Setting" books, and almost none of the other books in the series.
I guess for me, I'm pretty flexible with "setting". If an author has described enough of the universe that stories in other parts of it can even be imagined, it's a "setting". Heh.