Icons Again

May. 2nd, 2003 08:15 pm
rowyn: (Default)
[personal profile] rowyn
So, I'm looking at this icon I have and thinking, "You know, at least I could get a picture of myself that was in focus to use for an icon, if I'm not going to settle on a drawing to use."

And I'm digging through albums and packages of pictures and emails with jpgs. For a little context: I attend a couple of sf conventions a year, and over the course of each I'll wear between eight and sixteen or so different outfits. (Some people go to cons for the panels, some to hang out with their own kind, others to meet artists and authors. Me, I go to change clothes.) Because the cons are pretty small and not a whole lot of people costume, and I go through so much clothing, I attract what might be considered more than my fair share of photographers. The ones who use digital cameras usually email me the results, and a couple who've used film over the years make a point of giving their subjects copies of every picture.

So I'm looking through this stuff, and I say to Lut, "How can I like the way I look, and have, roughly, I don't know, a bazillion pictures of myself, and yet not have any good headshots?"

Lut chuckles and answers, "All of the people taking those photos are men. They're not looking at your face."

Sigh.

Date: 2003-05-02 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octantis.livejournal.com
Well, bear in mind also that, where cons and costumes are concerned, photographers are usually trying to fit the whole costume into the picture. Now, if the picture were focused -entirely- on areas-not-face but without the costume pictured as a whole, I'd be suspicious.

It also depends on the costume, I'm not sure what outfits you usually wear.

Gads, dinner has made me late for my drive. Away with me.

Date: 2003-05-02 07:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tuftears.livejournal.com
I've been meaning for a while to do an artpic of Rowyn, like the photo but smiling more because, well, the pic doesn't look all that happy! Actually, your pic looks more like 'Now you're in for it, buster.'

Maybe I should actually do it. Any suggestions you might have on an appropriate artistic tack?

Date: 2003-05-02 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tuftears.livejournal.com
Darn. I'll have to settle for giving you lots of art tips and living vicariously through your work. :)

Date: 2003-05-02 08:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prester-scott.livejournal.com
Finally! Better pictures! :)

Date: 2003-05-03 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] level-head.livejournal.com
I will say that you both are correct.

It is interesting that the visual "you" is rather younger than the written "you'.

Unless of course these pictures are all from many years ago? ];-)

===|==============/ Level Head

Re:

Date: 2003-05-03 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] level-head.livejournal.com
Got it.

===|==============/ Level Head

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
141516 17181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 05:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios