Worst RPG EV4R
Apr. 14th, 2003 10:09 pmThe F.A.T.A.L review. Warning: contains a LOT of foul language. It is very funny except when it hurts your brain and makes you want to scream, cry, and claw your own eyes out to STOP THE HURTING. You might want to just read the first bit, laugh, and then stop while you're still capable of thinking maybe it's just a big joke.
But IT'S NOT.
I got this link from broken toys, and as Scott Jennings put it: "Even reading the review made me feel unclean."
But IT'S NOT.
I got this link from broken toys, and as Scott Jennings put it: "Even reading the review made me feel unclean."
no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 06:27 am (UTC)And, really, it ought to make you feel good about yourself about being an RPG author. I mean, whatever flaws WorldTree might have as a system, it's got to be about ten gazillion times better than that.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 06:54 am (UTC)I did. If it's a prank, they put an insane amount of effort into it. (In any case, they put an insane amount of effort into it, and I use the word "insane" in a more literal sense than usual.) It's almost a thousand pages ... not terribly dense, but not that light. It can't be fewer words than World Tree, which is a quarter of a million. It doesn't seem to be automatically generated. It doesn't read like a prank, or the parts I read didn't.
And yes, World Tree is a good deal better.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 08:11 am (UTC)Even the review was an awful lot of effort, when you think about it. Brr. I want to write an email to the reviewers, but I'm not sure whether to thank them (I spent much of last night laughing over it, and I didn't even finish it) or ask them "WHY? FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY, WHY?"
no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 08:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-15 09:04 am (UTC)At least, I REALLY HOPE NOT.