Post Captain, by Patrick O'Brian
Oct. 8th, 2012 01:14 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
rowynI finished Post Captain this morning. It feels like I did little else other than read it this weekend, though I don't think that's quite true (especially since I didn't get the book until Saturday evening). Still. Didn't get much done this weekend.
Post Captain has far fewer battles and intricate sequences at sea than Master and Commander. Despite my ensuing ability to follow the action much better, I didn't like the book as well. I felt quite sorry for Jack Aubrey through most of the novel, mostly because he's so unhappy during it. Stephen Maturin is unhappy for a lot of it too, but honestly I expect Maturin to be downcast and Aubrey to be happy. An unhappy Aubrey is like a miserable puppy. It's just wrong, and one cannot blame the puppy for it: you have to blame the people who keep kicking him. (In one of the delightful ironies of O'Brian's work, the really irritating people are never the ones on the other side of the war. Jack gets on fine with his enemies: they have a straightforward relationship of trying to kill one another until one surrenders, and after surrender they're quite civil. No, it's the allies one has to watch out for.) Near the end of the book, Maturin notes that Aubrey has grown up and is no longer as cheerful as he once was. I'll grant that Aubrey did need to mature, but I really hope he gets back to being upbeat and good-natured again in the later books.
One of the charms of the work is that O'Brian is quite indifferent to genre. The first hundred pages might as well've been an Austen novel except for the male viewpoint characters. The story gets actual significant female characters with speaking parts and everything: not necessarily great female characters -- I didn't think Villiers was very well drawn, but perhaps this is because the POV characters are unreliable narrators in regards to her -- but it's an interesting change.
Some of the non-sea action comes across as contrived and melodramatic, which didn't help my general impression.
Overall, I'll give it a 7, and I've started to read the sequel. Which the author starts off by proving he's a bastard. Really, Mr. O'Brian. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
Note: comments may have spoilers, if I get to talking to![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
alltoseek about it.
Post Captain has far fewer battles and intricate sequences at sea than Master and Commander. Despite my ensuing ability to follow the action much better, I didn't like the book as well. I felt quite sorry for Jack Aubrey through most of the novel, mostly because he's so unhappy during it. Stephen Maturin is unhappy for a lot of it too, but honestly I expect Maturin to be downcast and Aubrey to be happy. An unhappy Aubrey is like a miserable puppy. It's just wrong, and one cannot blame the puppy for it: you have to blame the people who keep kicking him. (In one of the delightful ironies of O'Brian's work, the really irritating people are never the ones on the other side of the war. Jack gets on fine with his enemies: they have a straightforward relationship of trying to kill one another until one surrenders, and after surrender they're quite civil. No, it's the allies one has to watch out for.) Near the end of the book, Maturin notes that Aubrey has grown up and is no longer as cheerful as he once was. I'll grant that Aubrey did need to mature, but I really hope he gets back to being upbeat and good-natured again in the later books.
One of the charms of the work is that O'Brian is quite indifferent to genre. The first hundred pages might as well've been an Austen novel except for the male viewpoint characters. The story gets actual significant female characters with speaking parts and everything: not necessarily great female characters -- I didn't think Villiers was very well drawn, but perhaps this is because the POV characters are unreliable narrators in regards to her -- but it's an interesting change.
Some of the non-sea action comes across as contrived and melodramatic, which didn't help my general impression.
Overall, I'll give it a 7, and I've started to read the sequel. Which the author starts off by proving he's a bastard. Really, Mr. O'Brian. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
Note: comments may have spoilers, if I get to talking to
alltoseek about it.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2012-10-09 05:04 am (UTC)Oh he does, he does! You can't keep Jack down for long - he's amazingly resilient. He evens out a bit more, doesn't get the wild swings you saw sometimes in M&C and PC.
~~~
As for the female characters, I should warn you, POB is terrible with them. He yanks them this way and that to suit his plot purposes, and they are never more than stock stereotypical characters, really. Very disappointing, because as he first draws Sophie and Diana they could be really fantastic and breathe a whole new life. As it is, mmm, I start dreading when they show up. Which is too bad.
Fortunately so much of the series takes place at sea you don't feel the paucity of female characters you might otherwise.
~~~
Which the author starts off by proving he's a bastard
That's not fair, it's not POB's fault! That really did happen. POB took nearly everything of substance in the series from real life. He says it' in his author's notes - it's impossible to improve over what actually happened in the Royal Navy. And in the bureaucracies on land - that decision was actually made that way.
Wait until the start of The Mauritius Command. There he's a real bastard. But it gets better quickly :-)
Meanwhile, enjoy HMSS! It is a real treat - savour it! :D
no subject
Date: 2012-10-09 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-09 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-09 07:16 pm (UTC)People do all kinds of sneaky stuff at sea, but that's to be expected - that's only fair, in war. It's being undermined back at home that is so bothersome!
no subject
Date: 2012-10-09 04:08 pm (UTC)Also, poor Stephen. D:
I am sorry to hear about the female characters -- I was rather getting to like Sophia. I thought she and Jack might be a good influence on each other. It cracked me up when Stephen told her not to have another crumpet and she quite complacently fixed herself one. But not as much as his "you'll ruin your reputation, returning to Bath at dawn" and her "Perfect! Then I'll have to get married at once. What a splendid idea." :D
no subject
Date: 2012-10-09 07:21 pm (UTC)And as I said, POB tends to muck with their personalities and motivations to suit his plot purposes, without ranging too far outside their established character. He can get away with it since they are not central to the series.
POB views women too much as the 'other'; it doesn't occur to him that women are the heroines of their own stories; he doesn't treat them that way. They just act and react in accordance with the men's stories. That's the ultimately disappointing part.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-09 07:38 pm (UTC)Oh yeah. Get used to this. But the author keeps givething again!
Well, it would get dull if he got everything he ever wanted in the first two-three books - what would the rest of the series be about? :-)
The reversals are very typical of life, in general and especially that of a naval officer. Life at sea is very hazardous! And on land even worse, if you were bred up to sea! ;-)
he didn't have to set it up to happen to his characters
Honestly, in this case he did. He stuck Jack in place of a RL character for the RL battle; it's only fair that the RL aftermath happens for him too - the battle and the bureaucratic decision are linked. It would be weird if it didn't, like changing history. No history is harmed in the writing of these books! *g*
Trust me, there are many worse instances of random reversals - like the failure of the prize-agent. Sure, that sort of thing happened, but that particular one didn't have to happen to Jack at that particular time. That was definitely more plot driven!