rowyn: (studious)
[personal profile] rowyn
Using only biological drives to understand human nature is like using only the fact that computers ultimately run on binary to understand Microsoft Office.

Yes, that fact is true, and yet somehow it does not actually tell you "use Ctrl-C to copy".

Date: 2012-04-07 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tuftears.livejournal.com
Interesting purr-spective. };)

Date: 2012-04-07 04:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jordan179.livejournal.com
I would never recommend "using only biological drives" (emphasis mine) "to understand human nature." Doing so is to ignore the fact that our heritage is memetic in addition to being genetic; which is to say that we have culture; and that we are more intelligent than instinctive -- that we have thought.

Having said this, it is a very bad idea to ignore the role biological drives play in our lives, and even more importantly the effect of evolution on memetic constructs. Not all proposed customs are equally oriented to survival and reproduction, either genetic or memetic, and the accumulation of centuries and millennia of such selection has a profound effect on the cultures we evolve.

Date: 2012-04-07 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-vulture.livejournal.com
That's an interesting analogy; I like it. :)

Date: 2012-04-07 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octantis.livejournal.com
Word. This is a good way to phrase it, I'm going to save this.

Date: 2012-04-07 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terrycloth.livejournal.com
So you should only use biological drives to *debug* human nature?

Date: 2012-04-09 06:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jordangreywolf.livejournal.com
Trying to "understand" human nature purely as "biological drives" seems pointless. Rather, it seems more likely just a way to be dismissive of a more serious discussion. Like, "I wonder why {insert name here} is upset?" "Bah, it's all hormones!" (Translation: "I don't care to take it seriously, so here is a blanket lowest-common-denominator statement to kill the conversation.")

Date: 2012-04-09 06:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jordangreywolf.livejournal.com
Oh yeah, and isn't it Ctrl-V instead of Ctrl-C? Or is that the point and I'm just totally missing it?

Date: 2012-04-10 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladyperegrine.livejournal.com
That's what I was gonna say! Ctrl+C is copy! :-D

(I'm probably missing the point.)

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 3rd, 2026 10:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios