Wasting Water
Nov. 13th, 2009 02:24 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
WSJ article on low-flow showers. Includes, among other things, government regulation of showerhead pressure, plus bonus ways of subverting said regulations, and possible new regulations under consideration.
So ... stupid question: if the goal is to get people to stop wasting water, and if most municipalities own the waterworks … why don’t the municipalities raise the cost of water? I mean, I don’t care about my water usage because water is cheap. If water weren’t cheap, I’d take steps to use less. Don’t other people think that way too? It worked for gas when gas hit $4 a gallon; people started driving less. Am I missing something in the basic supply/demand equation here?
So ... stupid question: if the goal is to get people to stop wasting water, and if most municipalities own the waterworks … why don’t the municipalities raise the cost of water? I mean, I don’t care about my water usage because water is cheap. If water weren’t cheap, I’d take steps to use less. Don’t other people think that way too? It worked for gas when gas hit $4 a gallon; people started driving less. Am I missing something in the basic supply/demand equation here?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 10:05 pm (UTC)The air-mix shower that tricks you into thinking you're taking a regular shower is the nicest idea from the WSJ article. Assuming it works and isn't just like Jurann's misty-shower that doesn't feel like it's rinsing you off. >:)