rowyn: (thoughtful)
[personal profile] rowyn
WSJ article on low-flow showers. Includes, among other things, government regulation of showerhead pressure, plus bonus ways of subverting said regulations, and possible new regulations under consideration.

So ... stupid question: if the goal is to get people to stop wasting water, and if most municipalities own the waterworks … why don’t the municipalities raise the cost of water? I mean, I don’t care about my water usage because water is cheap.  If water weren’t cheap, I’d take steps to use less.  Don’t other people think that way too? It worked for gas when gas hit $4 a gallon; people started driving less. Am I missing something in the basic supply/demand equation here?

Date: 2009-11-13 09:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telnar.livejournal.com
Agreed; although the situation is much worse than government not seeing that raising the price of water would be a less intrusive way to achieve their goal. The cost of water to many users (especailly agricultural users) is actively subsidized.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12345 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 08:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios