The House Committee on Education and Labor hears testimony on nationalizing* pensions and 401(k) accounts.
Dear Congress:
I do not want a bailout. I do not want to be punished for having chosen to save for my retirement by having my savings taken away from me. I do not want my retirement savings to go bankrupt by the time I'm 65 the way the existing Social Security Administration is going to. In short:
DO NOT WANT.
Please keep your grubby hands off of my investments. K thx.
Love and kisses,
Rowyn
* Edit:
shaterri looked at the actual testimony (which I can't do at the moment, so see his comment below), and apparently the article linked above is at the least inflammatory if not outright fabrication: the testifying speaker doesn't advocate "confiscating" existing 401(k)s or pensions. I feel better. Thanks, Shaterri! And I'm sure Congress wouldn't take her seriously even if she had. Really. 99.9% sure, anyway.
Dear Congress:
I do not want a bailout. I do not want to be punished for having chosen to save for my retirement by having my savings taken away from me. I do not want my retirement savings to go bankrupt by the time I'm 65 the way the existing Social Security Administration is going to. In short:
DO NOT WANT.
Please keep your grubby hands off of my investments. K thx.
Love and kisses,
Rowyn
* Edit:
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 06:59 pm (UTC)And she contents that Social Security is fine, and the only failure is 401(k)s -- perhaps because the money is not in government hands to "spread the wealth". Specifically, she said:The article takes an alarmist tone -- but there is much to be alarmed about in her testimony.
Yes, there were others testifying, but the article was specifically talking about and quoting her. Her testimony implies confiscation but does not use the word. And it clearly is speaking to immediate action, and it clearly wants to bring an end to private savings programs, and "exchange" them for GRAs.
===|==============/ Level Head