Color Composition is HARD
Sep. 9th, 2007 01:17 pmAbout, I dunno, three months ago, I spent some time working on a picture. After two drafts and several thumbnails, I got the pencils to the point where I was more or-less happy with it. And then I thought, "I'll finish it up by coloring it."
This decision brought to my attention one of my many shortcomings as an artist. Namely, that I have no grasp of design.
B&W version of image: "Enough Rope"

Most of my artistic development has been purely mechanical: figuring out how to make my drawing look like whatever I'm trying to draw. I'm not all that good at this part, even, but that's still where most of my energy has gone.
There's this whole other side of art which boils down to "making your image look interesting" and I don't grok it at all. I was trying to get all of these bits together for this picture, and it was quite a struggle. my first effort at composing it fell flat, for example, and it took me a while to work out what to put in the background (and even now, I feel like I made a mistake in orienting the page vertically instead of horizontally, but I don't think I want to draw it all again. Especially since this is a gawdawful depressing thing to stare at for hours on end) . Once I finally figured all that out, I looked at the picture and thought, "I have no idea what colors to use on it."
My normal approach to color is completely haphazard. I think of what colors the things I'm drawing would have in the real world and then make it match. Sky: blue. Grass: green. Buildings: brick/stone/wood, possibly painted in neutral colors Etc. This ... sort of works. It works much better with natural scenes, because Nature has a pretty good color sense and seldom makes things that clash horribly. Collections of assorted man-made objects and people, not so much so.
So I asked
koogrr for help, and he offered various suggestions, like making all the background people shades of grey, which seemed like a pretty good idea. But I still felt 'meh' about it. I did a couple of color tests and put it to one side. Lately I've been thinking about it again, so today I finally did several more color tests, including trying to get bolder and use less obvious colors. ("Let's try ... purple! for the ground. How's that look?")
I do want the wings to be some shade of red, because this is (sort of ) a character portrait and the character has wings in shades of red and pink. Other than that, I'm not feeling tied to anyone idea except that I'd like it to, y'know, look good when I'm done. Coherent. Instead of haphazard. For a change.
Here're the color tests I've done so far:
1:

2:

3:

4:

5:

6:

I think the fifth one is my favorite of the lot but ... uh. Yeah. I don't know what I'm doing.
Any suggestions? Help? Please?
This decision brought to my attention one of my many shortcomings as an artist. Namely, that I have no grasp of design.
B&W version of image: "Enough Rope"
Most of my artistic development has been purely mechanical: figuring out how to make my drawing look like whatever I'm trying to draw. I'm not all that good at this part, even, but that's still where most of my energy has gone.
There's this whole other side of art which boils down to "making your image look interesting" and I don't grok it at all. I was trying to get all of these bits together for this picture, and it was quite a struggle. my first effort at composing it fell flat, for example, and it took me a while to work out what to put in the background (and even now, I feel like I made a mistake in orienting the page vertically instead of horizontally, but I don't think I want to draw it all again. Especially since this is a gawdawful depressing thing to stare at for hours on end) . Once I finally figured all that out, I looked at the picture and thought, "I have no idea what colors to use on it."
My normal approach to color is completely haphazard. I think of what colors the things I'm drawing would have in the real world and then make it match. Sky: blue. Grass: green. Buildings: brick/stone/wood, possibly painted in neutral colors Etc. This ... sort of works. It works much better with natural scenes, because Nature has a pretty good color sense and seldom makes things that clash horribly. Collections of assorted man-made objects and people, not so much so.
So I asked
I do want the wings to be some shade of red, because this is (sort of ) a character portrait and the character has wings in shades of red and pink. Other than that, I'm not feeling tied to anyone idea except that I'd like it to, y'know, look good when I'm done. Coherent. Instead of haphazard. For a change.
Here're the color tests I've done so far:
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
I think the fifth one is my favorite of the lot but ... uh. Yeah. I don't know what I'm doing.
Any suggestions? Help? Please?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-09 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-09 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-09 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-09 08:34 pm (UTC)Given that, using hot colors to fill in that triangle creates a very interesting dynamic: stable, peaceful physical arrangement, with moving, unsettling, invigorating colors. To my mind, the dichotomy between those things makes the picture more unnerving, which is appropriate for the subject matter.
All of which is a lead-in for my suggestion that you find some resources on color theory and compositional theory, read them and explore what they have to tell you. Working with color is very difficult, and I found I benefited immensely from conscious development of the skill with exercises and experiments. You might also. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 04:27 am (UTC)It occurs to me that the "garish" colors, including the red/pink tinted wings, would be rather muted in this image -- especially with the lowering sky you've shown in some of the tests. That certainly fits the mood.
Recommendation: Fire up YouTube and look at the opening of Pirates of the Caribbean 3 -- a similar scene (It's the "Hoist the Colors" -- or "hoist the pirates," really -- piece.)
Freeze the image, say at 1:34 in this video, and note how few colors are actually involved.
It's quite a trick, to convey the sense of the color while being restrained by realism -- but it can work.
It may not be photorealism you're looking for -- but it would enhance the drama, I think, of this piece. The video is a good place to look for details of the hangman's noose, too, which is quite thick compared to the rope.
Best wishes!
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 11:37 pm (UTC)As for other resources, you mentioned looking for things to rent? I'd recommend renting Samurai Jack, which has some of the most stunning and masterful use of color in any art form I've consumed lately.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 04:32 am (UTC)===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Date: 2007-09-09 08:58 pm (UTC)That said...I'm just setting out upon the path of trying to draw recognizable things, so I think it's really cool to see how well you're doing and how much equanamity you seem to have when approaching new things. You're really an inspiration for me, in terms of both being creative and setting goals for yourself and sticking to them.
♥
no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 01:45 am (UTC)And I think you're making a similar point to Kevin Pease's -- there's too many colors in the later ones, which is what's making them garish. I'm gonna play around with the cool background/warm foreground and see how that looks.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 01:31 am (UTC)Some of the most striking images I ever produced in my photojournalism days were B&W. Color came later, and was "cool" (and granted, my major awards were for color work) yet the ones that grabbed people were usually monotone.
Just my $.02---
no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 02:07 am (UTC)What I've seen, both in photography and in hand-created art (paint, charcoal, pencil, etc.) is a fundamental difference in vision--- IE: How one person "sees" an image in contrasts of lights and shadows, while another may see the same image as tones of color, both warm and cool and even neutral.
Just like no two people hear a concert the same way, so do no two people see an object or person or event with the same eyes, the same values, the same emotions.
Yet two artists, if skilled in their artistic crafts, may produce two entirely different interpretations of a scene or object or person, and both may be equally striking in their own way---but for entirely different reasons.
Peace.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 06:23 pm (UTC)Partly why I wasn't much help is I don't do many colour pieces, for almost all the reasons you describe. I like the grey shading, and hard edges and strong contrast, and it's much harder to get that with tones.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 06:38 pm (UTC)I think though, a much more important consideration than colour is a) what are you going to do with the lighting? and b) do you wish to reduce some of the detail in the background in order to emphasize the foreground?
I'd be tempted to mute the spectactors in terms of shadow, detail AND colour to really emphasize the pathos of the hanging figure.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 10:31 pm (UTC)* I'd have the crowd on the right turn their faces toward him; right now they're looking off the right side of the paper, which focuses viewer attention away.
* The rope seems too even; I'd have some loops of rope going over or under the other, maybe like so: \\\//\\\\/\\//// (where you can imagine the slashes are the directions that coils of rope would go)
The 5th one is nice but too dark; I like the first one more, you can give a sense of sunset that way. With a night-time sky, the crowd will be too indistinct.
my 2 cents.
Date: 2007-09-11 06:07 pm (UTC)I like the color in the foreground, grey in the background of the first one.
It makes me think that the foreground person is important but in big trouble and everyone in the background is sad and/or in trouble because of her or with her? Why are all the background people all chained or roped up too?
(do they all have wings too, or did they help the winged one?)
The last one makes the rope look golden... could the rope be special?
I'm curious... what's the story?
Looks like you could write a book about, um, Rope World. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 06:03 am (UTC)Incidently I liked the first rendition of the picuture best I think just looked best, more intresting to look at.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:38 am (UTC)i went shopping today in honor of your birthday and bought myself a new van ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 04:06 am (UTC)Happy birthday!