rowyn: (artistic)
[personal profile] rowyn



This is probably the page where I checked my email, because I had to get up and go to the computer to Google for a picture of aphids. Yes, that's more-or-less what an aphid looks like. One species of aphid, anyway. For all I know, it's a special breed of aphid that only eats Columbian coffee-plant leaves, and the tree-killing type of aphid looks totally different. You didn't expect a 24-hour comic to have good research, did you?

In other news: I don't know how real comic-book artists fit 6 panels into a page. My typical page had 4. Maybe if I'd used full-size layout sheets it'd've been feasible to squeeze in more. I was working on 8.5 x 11 inch sheets because I'm sick of stitching larger images together from multiple scans. The only think I like about the smaller sheets is that they're easy to scan, though. I like to work BIG! I would so love to have a giant scanner, but anything larger than 8.5x11" is prohibitively expensive, and it's not as though I can justify the purchase with my generally low output of art.

Date: 2005-07-01 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mister-wolf.livejournal.com
There is a relativly cheap 11x17 sacnner out there. There's a review somewhere on comixpedia. Anyway, I just scan my stuff in sections.

Re: Found it!

Date: 2005-07-01 09:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ltwarhound.livejournal.com
worth reading (http://www4.shopping.com/xPR-Mustek_ScanExpress_A3_USB~RD-176610250372)

not as useful a review (http://www.reviewcentre.com/review135295.html)

and a comparison of two different Musteks, the Bearpaw is 8.5x11, so its an odd choice to compare it to, but its what could be found, seems the A3 is fairly new and therefor there are few reviews on the 'net, professional or public:

from PCMag online (http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,369407,00.asp)

Also found an 'express review' which gave it 3 out of 5 stars, and had only a comment about lack of drivers. Given the lack of reviews, professional or public, it

In general, Mustek product user reviews, overall, are mixed, about what I'd expect of a company still in business. Haven't seen any company with exclusively rave reviews, the few I've seen that had bad reviews across the board tended to be out of business.

Re: Found it!

Date: 2005-07-01 09:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ltwarhound.livejournal.com
Somehow I managed to overlook the date on the review, 2002, so the A3 is not a new product. The lack of reviews on it, given that its the only budget priced 11x17 scanner I could find, is odd. Not good or bad, just odd.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 2nd, 2026 10:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios