Resolution
Nov. 10th, 2004 07:57 pmI was thinking, earlier today, about Nick Berg's death. As the news of his murder was first circulating, some of my LJ friends were pointing at things in the video, or in the events leading up to his death, that appeared inconsistent with the story presented in the video: that he'd been kidnapped and executed by Muslim terrorists while the videotape was rolling.
And I was wondering: did anything more ever come of that? Was a hypothesis advanced that explained the apparent inconsistencies? Were the concerns of armchair bloggers refuted by mainstream sources or official channels? Does anyone here know?
[Edit: Here's an example of the inconsistencies that were being discussed at the time.]
And I was wondering: did anything more ever come of that? Was a hypothesis advanced that explained the apparent inconsistencies? Were the concerns of armchair bloggers refuted by mainstream sources or official channels? Does anyone here know?
[Edit: Here's an example of the inconsistencies that were being discussed at the time.]
Re: Nothing was resolved
Date: 2004-11-11 02:37 pm (UTC)Oh, and for future reference, it's just Gary. I'm too boring for cool nicknames, so my LJ handle is simply my name.
Re: Nothing was resolved
Date: 2004-11-11 03:52 pm (UTC)===|==============/ Level Head
Which one? All of them. :-)
Date: 2004-11-12 01:14 pm (UTC)I know, it's a bit rude not to go into details. But the subject has drifted off the main topic(did anything get resolved regarding Nick Berg) and since this is in someone else's 'house' so to speak, I think it would be kind of rude to fill up her semi-private journal with debate over the side issues.
Re: Which one? All of them. :-)
Date: 2004-11-12 03:10 pm (UTC)And without FreeRepublic comments on their fathers, even. ];-)
===|==============/ Level Head