Apparently, rampant censorship doesn't apply to comics

[rowyn]

Non Sequitor often goes off on how worthless and biased the media has become (pro-industrialist, pro-government, pro-Republican). In his strips, anyone in the media who points this out is inevitably silenced or fired.

It amuses me that he is published in the same rampantly-censoring-of-liberals environment.

I guess he figures no one pays enough attention to the funny pages to censor them. :D

Comments

[level-head.livejournal.com]

I wonder how it is that the person thinks his/her identity would cause you to dismiss the writer out of hand? Most peculiar. They could be Kerry, or Bush, or the reincarnation of Karl Marx -- and the statements would say what they say.

As wrong as the writer is about that aspect, it is unsurprising that the other statements about you are similarly wrong. The writer does not know you -- and would benefit immensely by correcting that deficit.

I wish I could be as sanguine about your end of that bargain.

Best wishes, Lady Rowyn. And thanks for the link.

===|==============/ Level Head

[rowyn]

I wonder how it is that the person thinks his/her identity would cause you to dismiss the writer out of hand? Most peculiar.

I found that very puzzling, too. There is no one whose name would cause me to assign less credibility than I would to an anonymous statement. "Anonymous" is bottom of the barrel as far as attention/concern/credibility goes -- especially since, on LJ, an anonymous poster almost certainly won't see any reply I make. Obviously, that doesn't mean I'm going to disregard any comment left anonymously ... but I'm not going to take it more seriously just because I don't know who's behind it.

In any case, thank you for your kind words, sir.