How Not to Convert People to Your Cause
Sigh.
I suppose it's not quite as horrible as picketing the funerals of servicemen, but rampaging through a church service is the exact opposite of a persuasive argument, and acting like spoiled children is only going to give ammunition to the people who oppose your cause. Blah.
I suppose it's not quite as horrible as picketing the funerals of servicemen, but rampaging through a church service is the exact opposite of a persuasive argument, and acting like spoiled children is only going to give ammunition to the people who oppose your cause. Blah.
no subject
Even in cases where a vigorous response is called for, there are ways of doing it eloquently and in a thought-provoking way... not just in a provocative way. Doing stuff like this convinces nobody and is a step backwards.
no subject
no subject
That will do NOTHING for their cause.
no subject
I would agree with your analysis.
And the other person you alluded to, regarding the funerals of servicemen, probably shares the same fringe politics except for the issue of gay rights.
In both cases, their styles of attention-getting are very poor choices, in my opinion.
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
Actually, I like them even less. Because I think Phelps is making allies for the side he opposes, and I expect Bash Back is having the same reverse effect. :/
no subject
Anarchist groups don't tend to be very low key by their nature.
What annoys me is that when asked why this particular church was targeted, most of the protesters didn't know. For the love of frogs, know why the hell you are protesting, not just the cause but the particular location!
no subject
no subject
no subject
(a) Something really horrible JUST HAPPENED and we want to make sure people know we are angry about it and that it was important.
(b) We've given up on trying to convince these people and want to make their lives uncomfortable so that people will be afraid to join their side.
(c) We've suffered defeats lately and striking back would be a great morale booster and/or get more people to join our group who already agree with our cause.
(a) is the normal protest motivation, (b) is the motivation behind things like picketing abortion clinics. I have no idea what these people were thinking unless something anti-gay just passed in Michigan?
no subject
I think it is Prop 8 related.
There is a national-level protest scheduled for Nov 15.
no subject
no subject
(c) We've suffered defeats lately and striking back would be a great morale booster and/or get more people to join our group who already agree with our cause.
Unfortunately, their actions might stir up an opposing reaction; "Hey, that cause is made up of morons. I'm staying away from them."
no subject
no subject
I guess it might be raising awareness, but making people aware that your own group is full of jerks doesn't sound like a useful strategy either. :6
no subject
I'm not sure protests work very well in America in general anymore, though -- the spirit of revolution that makes them effective is pretty weak. Too many people think 'oh god, they're acting like whiny idiots' instead of getting caught up in righteous indignation or whatever.
no subject
no subject
Unfortunately, the same wetware makes us feel just as good 10 million years later. And now we're gifted and cursed with this whole "language" things which lets us complicate the issue enormously, sometimes closer to reality, sometimes further away. And there's still that raw and immediate need to feel strong again while a threat's nearby. But it's not gonna do them a damn bit of good, and that's very sad -- both its futility, and for the failure to recognize these urges for the crossed signal they are.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject